Veeva Systems: Industry Survey Reveals Clinical Data Management Delays Are Slowing Trial Completion
One of the largest, most in-depth surveys of clinical data management professionals shows that the time it takes companies to design and release clinical study databases is having a negative impact on conducting and completing trials.
This Smart News Release features multimedia. View the full release here: http://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20170921005594/en/
Types of data companies manage in their primary EDC vs. volume of data (Graphic: Business Wire)
According to the 2017 eClinical Landscape Study from Tufts Center for the Study of Drug Development, it takes companies an average of 68 days to build and release a clinical study database. Delays in releasing the study database are associated with an increase of nearly a month downstream for other data management processes such as patient data entry and time to lock the database at the end of the study. Respondents that deliver the database after first patient, first visit (FPFV), take nearly twice as long to enter patient data throughout the study and about 75% longer to lock the study database when compared to those that deliver the final database before FPFV.
“The study results indicate that companies face a growing number of challenges in building and managing clinical study databases,” said Ken Getz, research associate professor and director at the Tufts Center for the Study of Drug Development. “The results also show that the release of the clinical study database after sites have begun enrollment is associated with longer downstream cycle times at the investigative site and at study close out.”
Electronic Data Capture (EDC) Providers and System Use
EDC is the most widely adopted clinical application, used by all respondents (100%), followed by randomization and trial supply management (77%), electronic master file (70%), and safety (70%) systems. A majority (58%) of respondents use either Medidata Rave or Oracle Inform as their primary EDC system.
When asked about the type of data managed in their EDC, all (100%) CROs and sponsors cite electronic case report form (eCRF) data, followed by local lab and quality of life data (60% each). However, respondents say eCRF data is the highest volume of data they manage in their EDC system (at an average of 78% of the total data managed). The next highest data volumes reported are central lab data and local lab data at 5% each. Remaining data types reported are each 4% or less. This demonstrates the need for processes and systems to support the industry’s vision to have complete study data in their EDC.
More than three-quarters (77%) say they have issues loading data into their EDC application and most (66%) say EDC system or integration issues are the primary reasons they are unable to load study data.
Impact of Database Build Delays on Trial Cycle Times
The survey finds several common causes for clinical database build delays. Protocol changes is cited most by 45% of respondents, underscoring the challenge data management professionals have in dealing with changes as they are finalizing the clinical trial database for the start of the trial. This highlights the need to optimize the database design process with standards and systems that support more flexible design and rapid development.
Initial database delays also have significant downstream impacts on the time it takes sites to enter patient data in the EDC throughout the trial, as well as the final lock of the database once the study is complete. It takes on average five days from patient visit to when the data is entered into the EDC for companies that release the database before FPFV. When the database is released after FPFV, data entry time doubles to 10 days.
The impact of database build delays is even greater by the time companies get to database lock. Those who always release the database before FPFV get to database lock in an average of 31 days. Those who never release the database before FPFV take more than three weeks longer (54 days) to lock the database.
Sponsors take roughly 40% longer than CROs to build the database (73 vs. 53 days) and to get to database lock (39 vs. 28 days). Also, those using the two leading EDC systems report roughly 20% longer data cycle times (123 days) than those using other EDC systems (99 days), which includes time for database build (75 vs. 60 days), patient data entry (9 vs. 7 days), and database lock (39 vs. 32 days).
“Database build processes have remained largely unchanged over the past 10 years, and the process will only get more complicated as CROs and sponsors manage an increasing variety of clinical trial data,” said Richard Young, vice president of Veeva Vault EDC. “Organizations compensate for technology limitations by reducing the volume of data they input. Our focus should be on improving EDC systems so sponsors and CROs are no longer limited, and instead can run the trial they want.”
The 2017 eClinical Landscape Study: Assessing Data Management Practices, Performance, and Challenges from Tufts Center for the Study of Drug Development, sponsored by Veeva Systems (NYSE: VEEV), reviews the state of data management in life sciences with an in-depth look at the insights and opinions of clinical data management professionals at more than 250 companies, including sponsors and CROs, with an average of 17 years of experience in clinical data management. Download the report at veeva.com/eu/EDCSurvey.
About the Tufts Center for the Study of Drug Development
The Tufts Center for the Study of Drug Development at Tufts University provides strategic information to help drug developers, regulators, and policy makers improve the quality and efficiency of pharmaceutical development, review, and utilization. Tufts CSDD, based in Boston, conducts a wide range of in-depth analyses on pharmaceutical issues and hosts symposia, workshops, and public forums, and publishes Tufts CSDD Impact Reports, a bi-monthly newsletter providing analysis and insight into critical drug development issues. For more information, visit csdd.tufts.edu.
About Veeva Systems
Veeva Systems Inc. is a leader in cloud-based software for the global life sciences industry. Committed to innovation, product excellence, and customer success, Veeva has more than 550 customers, ranging from the world's largest pharmaceutical companies to emerging biotechs. Veeva is headquartered in the San Francisco Bay Area, with offices in Europe, Asia, and Latin America. For more information, visit veeva.com/eu.
2017 eClinical Landscape Study:
Assessing Data Management Practices, Performance, and Challenges
The 2017 eClinical Landscape Study examines the state of clinical data management in the life sciences industry. The goal of the research is to understand current clinical data management practices and assess the performance and challenges of electronic data capture (EDC) systems.
One of the largest, most in-depth clinical data management studies to date, this research captures the insights and opinions of 250 clinical data management professionals, including sponsors and CROs with an average of 17 years of clinical data management experience.
Clinical Systems and EDC Data Landscape
- EDC applications are the most prevalent clinical applications, used by all (100%) respondents, followed by randomization and trial supply management (77%), safety/pharmacovigilance (70%), electronic trial master file (eTMF) (70%), and clinical trial management (CTMS) (61%) systems.
- A majority (58%) of respondents use Medidata Rave or Oracle Inform as their primary EDC application. No other application was used by more than 6% of organizations.
- While all respondents use an EDC system, roughly one-third (32%) use paper case report forms (CRFs), indicating these organizations still rely on manual processes to manage data during their clinical trials.
- Organizations say they manage a wide range of data types in their primary EDC system including eCRF (100%), local lab (60%), quality of life (60%), central lab (57%), and ePRO (34%) data. Only 10% of companies have genomic data or mobile health data in their EDC.
- While companies have variety of data types in their EDC, respondents say the largest proportion of the data in their EDC system is eCRF data (estimated at 78% of total data managed). All other data types were each estimated at 5% or less of the total volume of data in the EDC, including local lab data (5%), central lab data (5%), quality of life data (4%), and ePRO data (3%). Genomic data and mobile health data make up the smallest portion of data in EDC systems at 0.4% and 0.3% respectively.
Clinical Data Management Cycle Times
- On average, it takes 68 days to build and release a study database, 8 days from patient visit to enter data in the EDC system throughout the study, and 36 days from the study’s last patient visit to database lock.
Sponsors, as well as those using the two most prevalent EDC
applications (Medidata Rave and Oracle Inform), report longer times to
build and release the study database and to lock the database after
last patient, last visit.
Average number of days to build and release the database:
- 73 days for sponsors vs. 53 days for CROs
- 75 days for those using the two most widely used EDC systems vs. 60 days for those using other EDC systems
Average number of days to lock the study database:
- 39 days for sponsors vs. 28 days for CROs
- 39 days for those using the two most widely used EDC systems vs. 32 days for those using other EDC systems
- Average number of days to build and release the database:
Clinical Study Database Build Times and the Impact on Clinical Trial Cycle Times
The up-front time it takes to build and release the clinical database
has potentially significant impacts on downstream processes, including
time to enter patient data in the EDC throughout the study and time to
final database lock after last patient, last visit.
- It takes on average five days from patient visit to when the data is entered into the EDC for companies that release the database before FPFV, and database lock time is 31 days.
- It takes on average 10 days from patient visit to when the data is entered into the EDC for companies that release the database after FPFV, and database lock time is 54 days.
- Nearly one-third (32%) of sponsors “often” or “always” release their EDC after FPFV has occurred, compared to 20% of CROs.
- One-third (36%) of those using the two most prevalent EDC applications “often” or “always” release their EDC after FPFV has occurred, compared to 22% of those using other EDC applications.
Top Causes for Database Build Delays and Data Loading Challenges
- The most common cause for database build delays is protocol changes (45%), followed by user acceptance testing (17%), and database design functionality (15%).
- Database build delays due to protocol changes are higher among CROs (52%) than sponsors (44%). Whereas database build delays due to design functionality are lower among CROs (7%) than sponsors (18%).
- Database build delays due to database design functionality is associated with significantly longer time to lock the database after last, patient last visit (50 days vs. the 36-day average).
- Three-quarters of respondents (77%) have issues that prevent them from loading data into their primary EDC system. Most (66%) cite EDC system issues or integration issues as the top challenges that prevent them from loading data.
For Veeva Systems Inc.
Sue Glanville / Cate Bonthuys
firstname.lastname@example.org / email@example.com
+44 (0) 7715 817589 / +44 (0) 7746 546773
Tufts Center for the Study of Drug Development
For more than 50 years, Business Wire has been the global leader in press release distribution and regulatory disclosure.
Tilaa tiedotteet sähköpostiisi
Haluatko tietää asioista ensimmäisten joukossa? Kun tilaat mediatiedotteemme, saat ne sähköpostiisi välittömästi julkaisuhetkellä. Tilauksen voit halutessasi perua milloin tahansa.
Lue lisää julkaisijalta Business Wire
US FDA Approves ONTRUZANT® (trastuzumab-dttb), Samsung Bioepis’ First Oncology Medicine in the United States21.1.2019 02:38 | Tiedote
Samsung Bioepis Co., Ltd. today announced that the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has approved ONTRUZANT® (trastuzumab-dttb), a biosimilar referencing HERCEPTIN® 1 (trastuzumab), across all eligible indications, namely adjuvant treatment of HER2-overexpressing breast cancer, metastatic breast cancer and metastatic gastric cancer or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma in patients who have not received prior treatment for metastatic disease. Please see Boxed Warnings and Important Safety Information for ONTRUZANT® below. ONTRUZANT® is Samsung Bioepis’ first oncology biosimilar to receive FDA approval, and will be marketed and distributed in the United States (US) by Merck, which is known as MSD outside of the US and Canada. “For many cancer patients in the US, battling cancer has not only been a health issue, but a considerable financial burden brought on by cancer treatment. Biosimilars are intended to be lower cost, high-quality treatment options that have the potential t
More4Apps to Join the Cloud21.1.2019 01:53 | Tiedote
More4Apps, the NZ-based software integration specialist known for its Excel based Oracle EBS integration tools, has confirmed it will be building product for Cloud ERP. “We're overwhelmed by the number of customers asking for our solutions to be migrated to the new ERP system, and that’s driven our strategic commitment to developing Cloud-based data entry tools,” said Bruce Doig, co-founder and Head of Innovation at More4Apps. “Already we have a large team working closely with a well known US fast food restaurant chain to deliver several loaders integrated with Oracle ERP Cloud.” As a Gold Partner with Oracle, More4Apps is well positioned to develop a range of integration tools for the new platform, with an intimate knowledge of the existing EBS and a close working relationship with a customer with whom they are collaborating to develop data loaders for the new SaaS platform. And whilst the capabilities of Cloud ERP are yet to be fully proven, More4Apps are confident there will be a pl
Warm welcome for ABB Formula E in Davos19.1.2019 12:00 | Tiedote
Just a few days before the start of the World Economic Forum 2019, Davos is celebrating a world premiere: The latest ABB FIA Formula E racing car - dubbed Gen2 – was transported on a train from the iconic Swiss Rhaetian Railway to Europe’s highest city, where it will be an exciting eyecatcher during the coming week at the Davos Platz railway station. This press release features multimedia. View the full release here: https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20190119005003/en/ ABB FIA Formula E racing car in Davos (Photo: Business Wire) From this Saturday until next Sunday, January 27, the Gen2 will be on display in a special glass case. Interested passersby can learn about the ABB FIA Formula E racing series as well as about the activities of ABB in e-mobility via an information system. With over 8,500 fast charging stations installed in 70 countries around the world, ABB is the global market leader for charging infrastructures. To watch the video, click here ABB (ABBN: SIX Swiss Ex) is
PMI’s Mission Winnow Goes Full Throttle with Ducati Corse for 2019 MotoGP™18.1.2019 20:00 | Tiedote
Philip Morris International Inc. (PMI) (NYSE: PM) is pleased to announce that its Mission Winnow initiative is expanding in 2019 to include the Ducati Corse racing team. Mission Winnow is a PMI-led campaign to raise global awareness of our passion and determination to constantly improve and evolve, as well as highlight the power of science, technology and innovation to build a better future. PMI has partnered with Ducati Corse since 2002 and has extended the relationship for another three years until the end of 2021. As of the start of this year’s MotoGP season, the team will be officially known as Mission Winnow Ducati. Mission Winnow was first launched in October 2018 with Scuderia Ferrari Mission Winnow, which – like Ducati Corse – has a passion for innovation and a relentless drive to improve in the team’s pursuit of victory. Ducati Corse is one of the most inspiring and resilient teams in MotoGP, with a 70-year history in racing. Ducati fans form a passionate community who appreci
IFF’s Frutarom Division Completes Acquisition of 60% of Thailand-based Mighty18.1.2019 15:50 | Tiedote
Regulatory News: International Flavors & Fragrances Inc. (NYSE:IFF) (Euronext Paris:IFF) (TASE:IFF), announced that its Frutarom Division has completed the acquisition of 60% of the share capital of The Mighty CO. LTD. (“Mighty”), a leading savory solutions provider in Thailand, thus continuing its growth strategy in Southeast Asia. Amos Anatot, President of IFF's Frutarom Division, said, “The completion of this deal with Mighty underscores that the Frutarom division will continue on its growth strategy and pursue attractive companies that create new opportunities or build on current capabilities.” Mr. Anatot continued, “And in this case, we are helping to grow our capabilities in savory solutions – already an area of strength for legacy Frutarom, now IFF." Mighty, founded in 1989, develops, produces and markets reaction flavors, with particular expertise in savory solutions. The company’s portfolio includes flavors, seasoning blends, marinades, and specialty functional raw materials f
LTI Q3 FY19: Constant currency revenue growth up 6.1% QoQ and 20.6% YoY; Net Profit jumps 32.8% YoY18.1.2019 15:02 | Tiedote
Larsen & Toubro Infotech (BSE code: 540005, NSE: LTI), a global technology consulting and digital solutions company, announced its Q3 FY19 results today. In US Dollars: Revenue at USD 346.9 million; growth of 5.6% QoQ and 18.2% YoY Constant Currency Revenue growth of 6.1% QoQ and 20.6% YoY In Indian Rupees: Revenue at Rs 24,729 million; growth of 6.1% QoQ and 31.3% YoY Net Income at Rs 3,755 million; growth of (6.2%) QoQ and 32.8% YoY “We are pleased to deliver another strong quarter with 5.6% QoQ growth in USD revenues. Our broad-based revenue growth, superior margin delivery and steady cash generation in Q3 is a testimony of our focused execution and client centricity. We are also thrilled to welcome Ruletronics to LTI family. Ruletronics enables businesses to transform and evolve digitally by providing innovative BPM and CRM solutions leveraging Pega Platform.” - Sanjay Jalona, Chief Executive Officer & Managing Director, LTI Recent Deal Wins Nets, the leading payments company in th
Uutishuoneessa voit lukea tiedotteitamme ja muuta julkaisemaamme materiaalia. Löydät sieltä niin yhteyshenkilöidemme tiedot kuin vapaasti julkaistavissa olevia kuvia ja videoita. Uutishuoneessa voit nähdä myös sosiaalisen median sisältöjä. Kaikki STT Infossa julkaistu materiaali on vapaasti median käytettävissä.Tutustu uutishuoneeseemme