Veeva Systems: Industry Survey Reveals Clinical Data Management Delays Are Slowing Trial Completion
One of the largest, most in-depth surveys of clinical data management professionals shows that the time it takes companies to design and release clinical study databases is having a negative impact on conducting and completing trials.
This Smart News Release features multimedia. View the full release here: http://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20170921005594/en/
Types of data companies manage in their primary EDC vs. volume of data (Graphic: Business Wire)
According to the 2017 eClinical Landscape Study from Tufts Center for the Study of Drug Development, it takes companies an average of 68 days to build and release a clinical study database. Delays in releasing the study database are associated with an increase of nearly a month downstream for other data management processes such as patient data entry and time to lock the database at the end of the study. Respondents that deliver the database after first patient, first visit (FPFV), take nearly twice as long to enter patient data throughout the study and about 75% longer to lock the study database when compared to those that deliver the final database before FPFV.
“The study results indicate that companies face a growing number of challenges in building and managing clinical study databases,” said Ken Getz, research associate professor and director at the Tufts Center for the Study of Drug Development. “The results also show that the release of the clinical study database after sites have begun enrollment is associated with longer downstream cycle times at the investigative site and at study close out.”
Electronic Data Capture (EDC) Providers and System Use
EDC is the most widely adopted clinical application, used by all respondents (100%), followed by randomization and trial supply management (77%), electronic master file (70%), and safety (70%) systems. A majority (58%) of respondents use either Medidata Rave or Oracle Inform as their primary EDC system.
When asked about the type of data managed in their EDC, all (100%) CROs and sponsors cite electronic case report form (eCRF) data, followed by local lab and quality of life data (60% each). However, respondents say eCRF data is the highest volume of data they manage in their EDC system (at an average of 78% of the total data managed). The next highest data volumes reported are central lab data and local lab data at 5% each. Remaining data types reported are each 4% or less. This demonstrates the need for processes and systems to support the industry’s vision to have complete study data in their EDC.
More than three-quarters (77%) say they have issues loading data into their EDC application and most (66%) say EDC system or integration issues are the primary reasons they are unable to load study data.
Impact of Database Build Delays on Trial Cycle Times
The survey finds several common causes for clinical database build delays. Protocol changes is cited most by 45% of respondents, underscoring the challenge data management professionals have in dealing with changes as they are finalizing the clinical trial database for the start of the trial. This highlights the need to optimize the database design process with standards and systems that support more flexible design and rapid development.
Initial database delays also have significant downstream impacts on the time it takes sites to enter patient data in the EDC throughout the trial, as well as the final lock of the database once the study is complete. It takes on average five days from patient visit to when the data is entered into the EDC for companies that release the database before FPFV. When the database is released after FPFV, data entry time doubles to 10 days.
The impact of database build delays is even greater by the time companies get to database lock. Those who always release the database before FPFV get to database lock in an average of 31 days. Those who never release the database before FPFV take more than three weeks longer (54 days) to lock the database.
Sponsors take roughly 40% longer than CROs to build the database (73 vs. 53 days) and to get to database lock (39 vs. 28 days). Also, those using the two leading EDC systems report roughly 20% longer data cycle times (123 days) than those using other EDC systems (99 days), which includes time for database build (75 vs. 60 days), patient data entry (9 vs. 7 days), and database lock (39 vs. 32 days).
“Database build processes have remained largely unchanged over the past 10 years, and the process will only get more complicated as CROs and sponsors manage an increasing variety of clinical trial data,” said Richard Young, vice president of Veeva Vault EDC. “Organizations compensate for technology limitations by reducing the volume of data they input. Our focus should be on improving EDC systems so sponsors and CROs are no longer limited, and instead can run the trial they want.”
The 2017 eClinical Landscape Study: Assessing Data Management Practices, Performance, and Challenges from Tufts Center for the Study of Drug Development, sponsored by Veeva Systems (NYSE: VEEV), reviews the state of data management in life sciences with an in-depth look at the insights and opinions of clinical data management professionals at more than 250 companies, including sponsors and CROs, with an average of 17 years of experience in clinical data management. Download the report at veeva.com/eu/EDCSurvey.
About the Tufts Center for the Study of Drug Development
The Tufts Center for the Study of Drug Development at Tufts University provides strategic information to help drug developers, regulators, and policy makers improve the quality and efficiency of pharmaceutical development, review, and utilization. Tufts CSDD, based in Boston, conducts a wide range of in-depth analyses on pharmaceutical issues and hosts symposia, workshops, and public forums, and publishes Tufts CSDD Impact Reports, a bi-monthly newsletter providing analysis and insight into critical drug development issues. For more information, visit csdd.tufts.edu.
About Veeva Systems
Veeva Systems Inc. is a leader in cloud-based software for the global life sciences industry. Committed to innovation, product excellence, and customer success, Veeva has more than 550 customers, ranging from the world's largest pharmaceutical companies to emerging biotechs. Veeva is headquartered in the San Francisco Bay Area, with offices in Europe, Asia, and Latin America. For more information, visit veeva.com/eu.
2017 eClinical Landscape Study:
Assessing Data Management Practices, Performance, and Challenges
The 2017 eClinical Landscape Study examines the state of clinical data management in the life sciences industry. The goal of the research is to understand current clinical data management practices and assess the performance and challenges of electronic data capture (EDC) systems.
One of the largest, most in-depth clinical data management studies to date, this research captures the insights and opinions of 250 clinical data management professionals, including sponsors and CROs with an average of 17 years of clinical data management experience.
Clinical Systems and EDC Data Landscape
- EDC applications are the most prevalent clinical applications, used by all (100%) respondents, followed by randomization and trial supply management (77%), safety/pharmacovigilance (70%), electronic trial master file (eTMF) (70%), and clinical trial management (CTMS) (61%) systems.
- A majority (58%) of respondents use Medidata Rave or Oracle Inform as their primary EDC application. No other application was used by more than 6% of organizations.
- While all respondents use an EDC system, roughly one-third (32%) use paper case report forms (CRFs), indicating these organizations still rely on manual processes to manage data during their clinical trials.
- Organizations say they manage a wide range of data types in their primary EDC system including eCRF (100%), local lab (60%), quality of life (60%), central lab (57%), and ePRO (34%) data. Only 10% of companies have genomic data or mobile health data in their EDC.
- While companies have variety of data types in their EDC, respondents say the largest proportion of the data in their EDC system is eCRF data (estimated at 78% of total data managed). All other data types were each estimated at 5% or less of the total volume of data in the EDC, including local lab data (5%), central lab data (5%), quality of life data (4%), and ePRO data (3%). Genomic data and mobile health data make up the smallest portion of data in EDC systems at 0.4% and 0.3% respectively.
Clinical Data Management Cycle Times
- On average, it takes 68 days to build and release a study database, 8 days from patient visit to enter data in the EDC system throughout the study, and 36 days from the study’s last patient visit to database lock.
Sponsors, as well as those using the two most prevalent EDC
applications (Medidata Rave and Oracle Inform), report longer times to
build and release the study database and to lock the database after
last patient, last visit.
Average number of days to build and release the database:
- 73 days for sponsors vs. 53 days for CROs
- 75 days for those using the two most widely used EDC systems vs. 60 days for those using other EDC systems
Average number of days to lock the study database:
- 39 days for sponsors vs. 28 days for CROs
- 39 days for those using the two most widely used EDC systems vs. 32 days for those using other EDC systems
- Average number of days to build and release the database:
Clinical Study Database Build Times and the Impact on Clinical Trial Cycle Times
The up-front time it takes to build and release the clinical database
has potentially significant impacts on downstream processes, including
time to enter patient data in the EDC throughout the study and time to
final database lock after last patient, last visit.
- It takes on average five days from patient visit to when the data is entered into the EDC for companies that release the database before FPFV, and database lock time is 31 days.
- It takes on average 10 days from patient visit to when the data is entered into the EDC for companies that release the database after FPFV, and database lock time is 54 days.
- Nearly one-third (32%) of sponsors “often” or “always” release their EDC after FPFV has occurred, compared to 20% of CROs.
- One-third (36%) of those using the two most prevalent EDC applications “often” or “always” release their EDC after FPFV has occurred, compared to 22% of those using other EDC applications.
Top Causes for Database Build Delays and Data Loading Challenges
- The most common cause for database build delays is protocol changes (45%), followed by user acceptance testing (17%), and database design functionality (15%).
- Database build delays due to protocol changes are higher among CROs (52%) than sponsors (44%). Whereas database build delays due to design functionality are lower among CROs (7%) than sponsors (18%).
- Database build delays due to database design functionality is associated with significantly longer time to lock the database after last, patient last visit (50 days vs. the 36-day average).
- Three-quarters of respondents (77%) have issues that prevent them from loading data into their primary EDC system. Most (66%) cite EDC system issues or integration issues as the top challenges that prevent them from loading data.
For Veeva Systems Inc.
Sue Glanville / Cate Bonthuys
firstname.lastname@example.org / email@example.com
+44 (0) 7715 817589 / +44 (0) 7746 546773
Tufts Center for the Study of Drug Development
For more than 50 years, Business Wire has been the global leader in press release distribution and regulatory disclosure.
Tilaa tiedotteet sähköpostiisi
Haluatko tietää asioista jo ennen kuin ne uutisoidaan? Kun tilaat tiedotteemme tältä julkaisijalta, saat ne sähköpostiisi yhtä aikaa suomalaisen median kanssa. Tilauksen voit halutessasi perua milloin tahansa.
Lue lisää julkaisijalta Business Wire
NMI Agrees to Acquire Creditcall to Expand EMV and Omnichannel Capabilities20.2.2018 16:04 | Tiedote
NMI, a leading provider of payments enablement technology for independent sales organizations (ISOs), independent software vendors (ISVs), value-added resellers (VARs) and payment facilitators, today announced it has signed a definitive agreement to acquire Creditcall, an omnichannel payment gateway and EMV solutions provider. With offices in Bristol, England, and New York, and customers throughout many regions of the world, Creditcall will give NMI a global presence and access to new markets. This acquisition will continue to differentiate NMI from traditional payment gateway providers by further expanding its omnichannel and EMV capabilities, creating a one-of-a-kind payment gateway platform supporting all channels of commerce including retail, e-commerce, mobile and unattended. “The payment technology requirements of today’s merchants are more complex than ever—they need to accept and process payments in all sales channels and environments,” said Roy Banks, chief executive officer o
Philip Morris International and Scuderia Ferrari Partner Together to Advance the Vision of a World Free of Tobacco Smoke20.2.2018 16:00 | Tiedote
Philip Morris International Inc. (NYSE/Euronext Paris: PMI) and Scuderia Ferrari have extended their partnership until 2021. Their successful collaboration spans more than 40 years. As of today, the partnership will be exclusively focused on advancing the cause of a smoke-free world – a world in which all people who would otherwise continue smoking switch from the most harmful form of nicotine consumption – cigarettes – to scientifically substantiated less harmful alternatives that are smoke-free. “We want to give the world’s 1.1 billion men and women who smoke the opportunity to make better and informed choices. We are committed to use all available resources, including our motorsports related activities, to accelerate momentum around this revolutionary change for the benefit of people who smoke, public health and society at large. We deeply appreciate Scuderia Ferrari’s support in this cause,” said PMI’s Chief Executive Officer, André Calantzopoulos. Creating global awareness of the
Legal & General Announces New Partnership with Technology Partner Slice Labs to Roll Out ‘On-Demand’ Homeshare Insurance20.2.2018 16:00 | Tiedote
Legal & General, the FTSE 100 financial services group and leading home insurance provider, has today announced a new technology partnership with Slice Labs Inc with the aim to offer a new on-demand homeshare insurance proposition for customers. The last few years has seen an increase in the popularity of on-demand insurance which allows customers to use a mobile app to purchase insurance to protect their personal belongings, car, or home when ‘at risk’. On-demand insurance offers customers flexibility of cover that is easy and convenient to buy and paying only for what they need when they need it. The partnership with Slice Labs Inc is another step in Legal & General’s commitment to invest in new technology and intend to use Slice Labs Insurance Cloud Services™ (ICS) platform to roll out on-demand homeshare insurance and other products to their customers. Founded in October 2015 Slice Labs provides tailored insurance offerings for home sharing costs. The two companies are, working tog
Wipro Positioned in ‘Winner’s Circle’ of HfS Blueprint Report on Enterprise Blockchain Services 201720.2.2018 15:20 | Tiedote
Wipro Limited (NYSE:WIT, BSE: 507685, NSE: WIPRO), a leading global information technology, consulting and business process services company, today announced that it has been positioned in the ‘Winner's Circle’ of Enterprise Blockchain service providers by HfS Research in the market study ‘HfS Blueprint Report on Enterprise Blockchain Services 2017’. This report was authored by Saurabh Gupta, Chief Strategy Officer, HfS Research. In the Enterprise Blockchain Services 2017 Report, HfS evaluated the blockchain capabilities of 21 service providers across the value chain of Strategic Advisory, Prototype Development, Production build and System Integration. The 'Winner's Circle' of the HfS Blueprint represents service providers who excel at both execution and innovation dimensions. The report states that Wipro is a leading blockchain services provider with scale, robust partnership ecosystem, in-house tools and live client engagements. Phil Fersht, CEO, HfS Research said, “The blockchain mo
Jetcraft Opens First London Office20.2.2018 13:55 | Tiedote
Jetcraft, the global leader in business aircraft sales and acquisitions, announces the opening of its first London office through its new UK company, Jetcraft Global (UK) Limited. The new London base cements Jetcraft’s commitment to the European region and demonstrates its confidence in the UK as a continuing hub of business opportunity. Chad Anderson, President at Jetcraft, says: “The opening of our London office comes as Jetcraft celebrates another record year -- with 93 transactions completed in 2017 – and rounds off a remarkable decade of more than 550 transactions exceeding $10bn in value. Our new London location creates even more ways for us to serve our clients and we are excited about the opportunities it presents.” Jetcraft’s new office comes at a time of significant growth in resources for the company, with the appointment of four senior sales posts from within the team, including Sean O’Leary, who will take on the role of Sales Director based in the new London office. Additi
Inmarsat Selects Sigma Systems for Large-Scale BSS Transformation20.2.2018 13:00 | Tiedote
Sigma Systems, the global leader in catalog-driven software, is pleased to announce a multi-year contract with Inmarsat, the leading provider of global mobile satellite communications services. With the digital revolution moving forward at great speed, Inmarsat recognized that a catalog-driven, agile approach to B/OSS was key to enabling more effective connections with their customers and partners through the products and services they sell. To this end, Inmarsat awarded Sigma a multi-year contract for its Catalog, CPQ (Configure Price Quote) and Order Management products to support Inmarsat’s next-generation satellite services across all customer verticals. Kirk Wilkenson, VP OneIT Programme at Inmarsat, commented: “Inmarsat is focused on driving customer value and making it simpler for customers and partners to work with us. We are launching a new B/OSS platform, utilizing a service-oriented component architecture, as part of a broader service delivery transformation to support our c
Uutishuoneessa voit lukea tiedotteitamme ja muuta julkaisemaamme materiaalia. Löydät sieltä niin yhteyshenkilöidemme tiedot kuin vapaasti julkaistavissa olevia kuvia ja videoita. Uutishuoneessa voit nähdä myös sosiaalisen median sisältöjä. Kaikki STT Infossa julkaistu materiaali on vapaasti median käytettävissä.Tutustu uutishuoneeseemme