STUK published a research report on nuclear safety cooperation that began when Soviet Union collapsed and ended in Russian war of aggression.
The Radiation and Nuclear Safety Authority helped Russia improve the safety of their nuclear power plants for thirty years from the beginning of the 1990s. This cooperation ended following Russia’s invasion of Ukraine. History researcher Petri Paju has reported on the experiences of this cooperation in a research report published by the Radiation and Nuclear Safety Authority.

For three decades, Finland carried out exceptional and impactful work to improve nuclear safety across its eastern border. Researcher Petri Paju’s report “Nuclear sector cooperation based on trust: the Radiation and Nuclear Safety Authority of Finland and efforts to improve nuclear safety in the former Soviet Union in 1990–2022” is based on interviews with experts from the Radiation and Nuclear Safety Authority (STUK) and Finnish power companies and with others that participated in the cooperation with Russia. It tells the story of carrying internationally significant responsibility, technical competence and cooperation. The goal was a safer future for the entire Northern Europe.
In the last few years of the Soviet era, the nuclear power plants in the country were also in poor condition. The Chernobyl nuclear power plant accident in spring 1986 was in fresh memory. Finland became particularly concerned about the safety of the nuclear power plants closest to us, Leningrad and Kola. On this basis, Finland launched cooperation with Russian authorities and nuclear power plant employees funded by the Ministry for Foreign Affairs, among other measures. This cooperation meant not only an exchange of information but also material assistance to improve the safety of nuclear power plants.
Petri Paju’s report describes how cooperation between Finland and Russia was successful after Finns understood the Russian operating culture. They began obtaining information on the condition of the plants and were able to improve matters when they adopted a conversational approach rather than dictating how everything should be. According to the report, experts from other countries who also offered assistance to Russia did not always share the same cultural understanding.
The research report also describes how the openness expressed by the Russian party in the early years declined over the years and how the influence of Moscow’s central government gradually shut the doors of nuclear power plants and the mouths of Russian partners in the 2000s. The cooperation had been based on personal relationships and frequent visits. These visits stopped during the COVID-19 pandemic. Russia’s invasion of Ukraine in 2022 caused Finland to discontinue this cooperation altogether.
Keywords
Contacts
Petri PajuDocent, Senior Research Fellow, Cultural HistoryUniversity of Turku
Tel:040 8398 613firstname.lastname@utu.fiLinks
Alternative languages
- FIN: STUK julkaisi tutkimusraportin ydinturvallisuusyhteistyöstä, joka alkoi Neuvostoliiton romahduksesta ja päättyi Venäjän hyökkäyssodan alkuun
- SWE: STUK publicerade en forskningsrapport om kärnsäkerhetssamarbete som började när Sovjetunionen kollapsade och slutade när det ryska anfallskriget började
Subscribe to releases from Säteilyturvakeskus (STUK)
Subscribe to all the latest releases from Säteilyturvakeskus (STUK) by registering your e-mail address below. You can unsubscribe at any time.
Latest releases from Säteilyturvakeskus (STUK)
STUK:s luftinsamlare fångade radioaktivt brom18.12.2025 11:12:26 EET | Pressmeddelande
Strålsäkerhetscentralen upptäckte en ofarlig liten mängd radioaktivt brom i utomhusluften i Vanda i ett prov som samlades in den 11-12 december. Brom kan härstamma till exempel från en spårämnesmätning som har utförts korrekt i en industrifacilitet, där en radioaktiv isotop av brom har använts som spårämne.
STUKin ilmankerääjään tarttui radioaktiivsta bromia18.12.2025 11:12:26 EET | Tiedote
Säteilyturvakeskus havaitsi Vantaan ulkoilmassa haitattoman pienen määrän radioaktiivista bromia joulukuun 11.-12. kerätyssä näytteessä. Bromi voi olla peräisin esimerkiksi teollisuuslaitoksessa asiallisesti tehdystä kokeesta, jossa bromin radioaktiivista isotooppia on käytetty merkkiaineena.
Radonhalten i hemmet kan inte fastställas utifrån grannbostadens mätresultat15.12.2025 11:32:26 EET | Pressmeddelande
Enligt en utredning av Strålsäkerhetscentralen kan radonhalterna variera betydligt i samma husbolags bostäder. Radonhalten är inte konstant ens i en enskild bostad. Radonbekämpningen i byggskedet av nya hus och radonsaneringen i ett senare skede fungerar länge, men uppföljningen är viktig.
Kodin radonpitoisuutta ei voi päätellä naapuriasunnon mittaustuloksesta15.12.2025 11:32:26 EET | Tiedote
Säteilyturvakeskuksen selvityksen mukaan radonpitoisuudet voivat vaihdella saman taloyhtiön asunnoissa merkittävästi. Radonpitoisuus ei ole vakio edes yksittäisessä asunnossa. Uusien talojen rakennusvaiheen radontorjunta sekä myöhemmän vaiheen radonkorjaukset toimivat pitkään, mutta seuranta on tärkeää.
You cannot conclude your home’s radon concentration from the results measured in the neighbouring dwelling15.12.2025 11:32:26 EET | Press release
According to a report by the Radiation and Nuclear Safety Authority, radon concentrations may vary significantly between the dwellings within the same housing company. Radon concentration does not remain constant even in an individual dwelling. Radon prevention in the construction phase of new houses and radon mitigation measures in later stages work for a long time, but monitoring is important.
In our pressroom you can read all our latest releases, find our press contacts, images, documents and other relevant information about us.
Visit our pressroom